Persuasion, Interrupted: The Effect of Momentary Interruptions on Message Processing and Persuasion

نویسندگان

  • DANIELLA M. KUPOR
  • ZAKARY L. TORMALA
چکیده

Marketers often seek to minimize or eliminate interruptions when they deliver persuasive messages in an attempt to increase consumers’ attention and processing of those messages. However, in five studies conducted across different experimental contexts and different content domains, the current research reveals that interruptions that temporarily disrupt a persuasive message can increase consumers’ processing of that message. As a result, consumers can be more persuaded by interrupted messages than they would be by the exact same messages delivered uninterrupted. In documenting this effect, the current research departs from past research illuminating the negative effects of interruptions, and delineates the mechanism through which and conditions under which momentary interruptions can promote persuasion.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Na€ıve theories about persuasion: implications for information processing and consumer attitude change

Consumers have knowledge about persuasion that includes na€ıve theories about persuasion. The present work examines na€ıve theories with regard to whether consumers associate the meaning of persuasion as something that is either good or bad. Furthermore, na€ıve theories about persuasion are demonstrated to affect how consumers respond to a persuasive message. Two studies are presented, one that...

متن کامل

The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

The present research proposes that sources in the numerical majority (vs. minority) can affect persuasion by influencing the confidence with which people hold their thoughts in response to the persuasive message. Participants received a persuasive message composed of either strong or weak arguments that was presented by a majority or a minority source. Consistent with the self-validation hypoth...

متن کامل

Style Versus Substance: Multiple Roles of Language Power in Persuasion

This research explores how message style influences persuasion in conjunction with message substance. Using the elaboration likelihood model, the study operationalizes message style as language power and message substance as argument quality, then considers the multiple roles language power can assume in persuasion. The authors investigate whether language power acts as a (a) central argument, ...

متن کامل

Answering Questions about Questions: A Persuasion Knowledge Perspective for Understanding the Effects of Rhetorical Questions

Past research is not clear on the process by which rhetorical questions influence persuasion (i.e., increased focus on message arguments vs. on the persuasion agent). Based on recent theories of persuasion knowledge and rhetorical figures in advertising, our model delineates conditions under which rhetoricals are likely to enhance argument elaboration (low salience of the rhetorical) and those ...

متن کامل

Types of Evidence and Routes to Persuasion: The Unimodel Versus Dual-Process Models

Following the pioneering research of Hovland and his colleagues in the 1950s (e.g., Hovland & Janis, 1959; Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953; Hovland, Lumsdaine, & Sheffield, 1949), social psychologists have proposed a variety of specific “process” models of persuasion to explain how the plethora of source, message, recipient, and context factors produce changes in attitude (for reviews, see Eagly...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015